🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed new appeals had come from mediators to restart talks with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, European countries exercised their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions resume.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the strikes started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently attempted to impose their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and remains the final solution to address conflicts, but its requirements, regulations and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and respect, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this assault."